ITA Wealth Management

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Lifetime ITA Membership
  • Portfolios
    • Bethe Portfolio
    • Bohr Portfolio
    • Carson Portfolios
    • Dirac Portfolio
    • Einstein Portfolio
    • Franklin Portfolio
    • Galileo Portfolio
    • Gauss Portfolio
    • Huygens Portfolio
    • Kahneman-Tversky Portfolio
    • Kepler Portfolio
    • McClintock Portfolio
    • Millikan Portfolio
    • Pauling Portfolio
    • Rutherford Portfolio
    • Schrodinger Portfolio
  • Forum
  • Reset Password
  • Contact Me
  • ITA Feedback
  • About Me
You are here: Home / ITA Portfolios / Bohr Portfolio / Bohr Asset Allocation Changed

Bohr Asset Allocation Changed

February 17, 2014 By Lowell Herr

With the market near an all-time high, I am altering the Strategic Asset Allocation (SAA) of the Bohr Portfolio to a more conservative plan.  The big move is to reduce exposure to equities and increase the percentage in bonds.  This change increased the IRR percentage of the ITA Index.  Another reason for the ITA Index IRR percentage to move to a high value is that I also switched the precious metals ETF from GTU (-49.2%) to GLD (133.0%).  I no longer hold shares of GTU.  Even though only 3% is allocated to Precious Metals, switching from a large negative IRR to a huge positive IRR value creates a significant change in the overall Internal Rate of Return value for the customized index.

Bohr Dashboard:  Here we have the new SAA for the Bohr portfolio.  This puts the Bohr closer to the asset allocation alignment suggested by David Swensen in his book, Unconventional Success.

Dashboard

(Visited 101 times, 1 visits today)

Filed Under: Bohr Portfolio Tagged With: Bohr Portfolio

Comments

  1. David Davenport says

    February 17, 2014 at 4:49 PM

    Could you please screen the ETF’s IBB, XBI, and KRE? Also, individual stocks CCJ and ATK?

    • HedgeHunter says

      February 18, 2014 at 6:18 AM

      David,

      Ranking just the 5 Assets you list above ranks them in the order IBB, XBI, ATK, CCJ, KRE. All rank higher than SHY so would be candidates for purchase.

      A Cluster analysis shows that IBB and XBI are strongly correlated (90%) with the others offering good diversification.

      A Cluster Weighted Momentum analysis recommends the following allocations: IBB – 43%; ATK – 25%; CCJ – 21.7%; KRE – 10% (XBI is omitted since it is in the same cluster as IBB – if you did not want to invest 43% in IBB you could split this between IBB and XBI).

      XBI and CCJ are showing strong positive acceleration (>24%), IBB is positive (7.6%) with KRE and ATK both negative (>-5%).

      Hope this gives you some of the answers you are looking for.

      David

      • David Davenport says

        February 18, 2014 at 4:37 PM

        Hedge Hunter: Thanks for your reply.

        What do your screens say about VGPMX, Vanguard’s mostly gold miner ETF?

        • David Davenport says

          February 18, 2014 at 4:38 PM

          Correction: VGPMX is a mutual fund instead of an ETF.

          • David Davenport says

            February 18, 2014 at 4:56 PM

            Also try PSCE, a smaller cap. oil and gas ETF.

          • HedgeHunter says

            February 19, 2014 at 9:38 AM

            David,

            This is getting too complex/detailed to answer in the comments section. Let me have your email address and I’ll send you a detailed response with screenshots.

            David

  2. David Davenport says

    February 19, 2014 at 4:45 PM

    Email me at w*d*d*a*v*e*n*p*o*r*t*1@gmail.com with the asterisks omitted.

Most Popular Posts

  • Dirac Portfolio Review – 31 December 2020 (265)
  • Understanding The New Kipling Spreadsheet (217)
  • Portfolio Construction For 2021 (170)
  • Asset Allocation Feature of the Kipling Spreadsheet (155)
  • What Is A Good Sortino Ratio? (133)
  • Sample Carson IRR Comparisons (113)
  • Kepler ETF Rankings (111)
  • Is The Dual Momentum System Broken? (103)
  • Seasonality: Sell in May and Go Away (91)
  • Bullish Percent Indicators: 27 November 2020 (87)

General Investment News

Portfolios coming up for review are:  Euclid, Bethe, and Carson Trio.  Non-scheduled portfolios may be reviewed.  If you are a new user, check the posts you missed. Links to Random Posts are found in the lower right-hand footer or just to the right of what you are now reading.  Most popular posts are found in the lower left-hand footer.

Contact me at itawealth@comcast.net if interested in a Lifetime Membership.  Current Platinum members will be grandfathered into a Lifetime Membership in the summer of 2021.

Random Posts

  • I Sold My House: How Do I Invest $300,000?
  • MEDA: Reducing Poverty Through Food Production
  • Is There an Advantage in Splitting a Portfolio into Tranches?
  • ETF Rankings and Cluster Analysis as of September 25, 2014
  • Bethe Portfolio Review: 19 October 2018
  • Euclid Portfolio Review: 15 July 2019
  • Einstein Portfolio Review: 25 February 2020
  • Kahneman-Tversky Portfolio Review – 27 April, 2018
  • Maxwell Portfolio Review: Simple Rebalancing
  • Euclid Portfolio Review: 28 May 2014

Log in | Website Design by BOING