ITA Wealth Management

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Guest Registration
  • Lifetime Member
  • Forum
  • Reset Password
  • Contact Me
  • About Me
You are here: Home / Critical Material / Charles Ellis: Loser’s Game of Stock Picking

Charles Ellis: Loser’s Game of Stock Picking

April 16, 2014 By Lowell Herr

Let’s revisit Charles D. Ellis’ 1995 paper, “The Loser’s Game,” where he describes his Break-Even Return (BER) equation. Here is a review of this equation.

BER = [(Turnover percentage x Transaction Cost) + Management Fee + Target Return]/Market Return

It is quite easy to set up this equation in an Excel spreadsheet and play around with different variables. I discussed these variables with an Internet friend and using what we think are reasonable “modern-day” assumptions we came up with this BER value.

It is not unusual for actively managed mutual funds to have a 100% turnover and management fees to run 75 basis points. If we assume Target Return equals Market Return at 9% and the transaction costs are 1.5% going in and coming out of the market, the equation will look like this.  Transaction costs are highly dependent on the dollars one is investing and 1.5% is now on the high side, particularly for those of us who rely heavily on commission free ETFs.

BER = [(1.0 x (.015 + .015) + 0.0075 + .09)]/0.09 = 1.4166 or 1.42. This money manager must then turn in a return 1.42 x 9% or 12.7% to equal the market. Costs do matter.  Assume you are a TDAmeritrade client and you are picking individual stocks.  If you negotiated $7.00 trades and you are buying only when you have $1,000 to invest, then $7.00/$1,000 reduces commissions to 0.7% going in and out.  BER is then the following.

BER = [(1.0 x (0.007 + 0.007) + 0.0075 + 0.09)]/0.09 = 1.2388 or 1.24.  This manager must turn in a return of 1.24 x 9.0% or 11.1%.  Still a very high percentage.

Assume you are managing an ETF portfolio and you are able to reduce the portfolio turnover down to 10% per year or a reduction of 1/10 the active money manager. This is not unusual based on my experience working with passive portfolios.  Further, assume we can reduce commissions and bid/ask slippage to 0.5% in and 0.5% out. If we find liquid ETFs that are not actively managed, we can reduce the management fee to 30 to 40 bases points. Since we are likely to hold a few ETFs that are not commission free, let’s raise this to 50 basis points. Now the BER equation will look like this.

BER = [(0.1 x (0.01 0.01) + 0.0050 + 0.09)]/0.09 = 1.08. This ETF manager must generate a return of 1.08 x 9% or 9.7% to match the market. That is a 0.7% return to match the market return of 9.0%. Quite a change.  If you are paying someone 70 basis points to manage your portfolio, you are paying out a 100% rate to beat the market.  Read that sentence again.

Here are the important points to remember.

  • Reduce trades in order to bring down the turnover percentage or use commission free ETFs.
  • Purchase in large enough quantities to lower commissions as a percentage of the total investment. Use a deep discount broker. Use limit orders to reduce bid/ask slippage.
  • Find liquid ETFs with low expense ratios so as to minimize management fees. Look for low expense ratios.

 

 

(Visited 277 times, 1 visits today)
facebookShare on Facebook
TwitterTweet
FollowFollow us
PinterestSave

Filed Under: Critical Material

Meta Data

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Search

Recent Posts

  • Kepler Portfolio Review: 17 May 2022 May 17, 2022
  • Galileo Portfolio Review: 17 May 2022 May 17, 2022
  • Copernicus Portfolio Update: 14 May 2022 May 16, 2022
  • ITA Portfolio Performance Data: 14 May 2022 May 14, 2022
  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 1): 13 May 2022 May 14, 2022
  • Bullish Percent Indicators: 14 May 2022 – Sector Buy Recommendations May 14, 2022
  • McClintock Portfolio Review: 13 May 2022 May 13, 2022

Recent Comments

  • Lowell Herr on Bullish Percent Indicators: 14 May 2022 – Sector Buy Recommendations
  • Lowell Herr on Bullish Percent Indicators: 14 May 2022 – Sector Buy Recommendations
  • jayaraman ramakrishnan on Bullish Percent Indicators: 14 May 2022 – Sector Buy Recommendations
  • Lowell Herr on Schrodinger Portfolio Review: 13 May 2022
  • HedgeHunter on Schrodinger Portfolio Review: 13 May 2022
  • HedgeHunter on Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 5): 6 May 2022
  • HedgeHunter on Darwin Portfolio Review: 18 April 2022
  • Lowell Herr on Darwin Portfolio Review: 18 April 2022
  • Lowell Herr on Pauling Portfolio Review: 25 March 2022
  • HedgeHunter on Learning More About Options

Users Online

3 Users Online
Users: 1 Guest, 2 Bots

Popular Posts

  • 2022 Guidelines for Relative Strength Portfolios
  • Hindsight is 2021 – A Year-End Retrospective and…
  • Protected: Modified Kipling Workbook with Risk Ratios
  • Preparing Investments for 2022
  • The True Cost of Management Fees
  • Response to Comments made by ITA member (John Shelton)
  • Using Volatility as a Diversifier and a Portfolio Hedge
  • Investment Policy Statement: February 2022
  • Hawking Portfolio Review – 1 April 2022
  • Dual Momentum Investing by Gary Antonacci

General Investment News

Portfolios coming up for review are:  Kepler, Bohr, and Franklin.  Non-scheduled portfolios may be reviewed.  If you are a new user, check the posts you missed. Links to Random Posts are found in the lower right-hand footer or just to the right of what you are now reading.  Most popular posts are found in the lower left-hand footer.

Check the Forum for more detailed information.  If you wish to begin a financial discussion, use the Forum.

Contact me at itawealth@comcast.net if interested in a Lifetime Membership.  Long-time Platinum members are now Lifetime members and this blog is free to all who signup as a Guest.  A few blogs are reserved for Lifetime members.

Random Posts

  • Retirement Planning Mistake #2
  • Gauss Portfolio Review: 24 August 2021
  • The Feynman Study: Part 6-4
  • Galileo Portfolio Review: 10 November 2021
  • Absolute Acceleration
  • Galileo Portfolio Review: 17 May 2022
  • Preparing For Next Week
  • Kahneman-Tversky Portfolio Review: 29 October 2021
  • Why I Use ETFs Instead of Individual Stocks
  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 3) – 29 October 2021
  • Broad Market Conditions: Pay Attention

Log in | Website Design by BOING