ITA Wealth Management

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Guest Registration
  • Lifetime Member
  • Forum
  • Reset Password
  • Contact Me
  • About Me
You are here: Home / Portfolio Management / Benchmarks / Serious Investors Benchmark Their Portfolio

Serious Investors Benchmark Their Portfolio

September 20, 2013 By Lowell Herr

Serious Investors Benchmark Their Portfolio 1

Establishing an appropriate benchmark for a portfolio is essential if one is serious about investing.  Avoiding portfolio bench-marking is an act of self-deception.  Exactly what is the purpose of a benchmark and what are the requirements for a fair and reasonable benchmark. Here is one definition of bench-marking.

In the investing world, the S&P 500 is frequently used as a benchmark for portfolios made up of U.S. Equities.  Even though the S&P 500 is a common benchmark, it is not the most appropriate as it does not satisfy all benchmark requirements listed below.

1. The benchmark must be investable. If one is using the S&P 500 as the benchmark, then an investable vehicle is the VFINX index fund as it closely tracks the performance of the S&P 500.

2. The benchmark must be identified in advance. It is unfair to set up a benchmark after the fact so the portfolio shows up better with respect to the benchmark.

3. The benchmark must be objectively constructed. Many investors will use a simple benchmark such as Vanguard’s Total Market Index ETF, VTI, or the index fund, VTSMX.  These are certainly objective benchmarks as one can easily understand their construction. It becomes more difficult to meet this requirement when one begins to put together a customized benchmark.

4. A good performance benchmark has an unambiguous composition.

5. A good performance benchmark is easily measured.

6. A strong portfolio tracking tool provides the user with a means for measuring portfolio risk.

Why do investors avoid portfolio bench-marking?  1) It takes time to learn, understand, and implement.  Most investors do not have the time or inclination to set up portfolio benchmarks.  2) There are few affordable tools available for the small investor to adequately benchmark their portfolio. Even the affordable commercial programs have gaps when it comes to meeting the above standards.  3) Investors do not want to know the truth about the performance of their portfolio. 4) Investors insist in setting up their own standards of portfolio evaluation, well outside the accepted standards of the industry.

Caution:  Whatever you do, avoid the “Beardstown Ladies” portfolio tracking mistake.

 

(Visited 264 times, 1 visits today)
facebookShare on Facebook
TwitterTweet
FollowFollow us
PinterestSave

Filed Under: Benchmarks, Critical Material Tagged With: Benchmarking

Meta Data

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Search

Recent Posts

  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 2): 24 June 2022 June 26, 2022
  • Bullish Percent Indicators: 24 June 2022 June 25, 2022
  • Darwin Portfolio Review: 17 June 2022 June 19, 2022
  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 1): 17 June 2022 June 18, 2022
  • Bullish Percent Indicators: 17 June 2022 June 18, 2022
  • Portfolio Management In A Volatile and Bearish Market June 13, 2022
  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 5): 10 June 2022 June 11, 2022

Recent Comments

  • Lowell Herr on Bullish Percent Indicators: 17 June 2022
  • Lowell Herr on Bullish Percent Indicators: 10 June 2022
  • Lowell Herr on Bullish Percent Indicators: 10 June 2022
  • Mark Holbrook on Bullish Percent Indicators: 10 June 2022
  • Lowell Herr on Bullish Percent Indicators: 10 June 2022
  • Mark Holbrook on Bullish Percent Indicators: 10 June 2022
  • Lowell Herr on Bullish Percent Indicators: 20 May 2022
  • Lowell Herr on McClintock Portfolio Review: 10 June 2022
  • Lowell Herr on Bullish Percent Indicators: 20 May 2022
  • Steven Lefley on Bullish Percent Indicators: 20 May 2022

Users Online

6 Users Online
Users: 1 Guest, 5 Bots

Popular Posts

  • Hawking Portfolio Review – 1 April 2022
  • Investment Policy Statement: February 2022
  • How To Handle This Selloff: 18 May 2022
  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 1): 8 April 2022
  • 2022 Guidelines for Relative Strength Portfolios
  • Kepler Portfolio Review: 15 March 2022
  • Hawking Portfolio Review – 1 March 2022
  • Schrodinger Portfolio Review: 4 February 2022
  • Using Volatility as a Diversifier and a Portfolio Hedge
  • Schrodinger Portfolio Review: 10 March 2022

General Investment News

Portfolios coming up for review are:  Huygens, Galileo, Carson Trio, and Einstein.  Non-scheduled portfolios may be reviewed.  If you are a new user, check the posts you missed. Links to Random Posts are found in the lower right-hand footer or just to the right of what you are now reading.  Most popular posts are found in the lower left-hand footer.

Check the Forum for more detailed information.  If you wish to begin a financial discussion, use the Forum.

Contact me at itawealth@comcast.net if interested in a Lifetime Membership.  Long-time Platinum members are now Lifetime members and this blog is free to all who signup as a Guest.  A few blogs are reserved for Lifetime members.

Random Posts

  • Huygens Update: 20 October 2021
  • How Risky is Your Portfolio? – Another Perspective
  • Pauling Dual Momentum Review: 18 January 2022
  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 1): 4 March 2022
  • Darwin Portfolio Review – 27 September 2021
  • Retirement Planning Mistake #1
  • Investment Policy Statement: February 2022
  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 1): 17 June 2022
  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 1): 19 November 2021
  • Constructing a “Core” Investment Portfolio : Part 3 – Risk Parity and Volatility Targeting
  • Nine Critical Investment Decisions

Log in | Website Design by BOING