ITA Wealth Management

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Guest Registration
  • Lifetime Member
  • Forum
  • Reset Password
  • Contact Me
  • About Me
You are here: Home / Critical Material / Debunking Dividend Fallacies

Debunking Dividend Fallacies

February 19, 2016 By Lowell Herr

Debunking Dividend Fallacies 1

San Luis Obispo bike rider and friend.

While I considered placing a reference to this dividend article in the Forum, I thought it sufficiently interesting to write a short blog on the subject.  Dividends Do Not Make Up The Majority Of Long-Term Total Returns is an old Seeking Alpha article that debunks what many Dividend Growth Investors (DGI) advocate.  While the article will appeal mainly to math nerds, it is very understandable.  Take the time to study it and don’t rush through the arguments.

First, what is a DGI?  In general, these are investors who place the importance of dividends above capital gains.  The basic philosophy is to save and purchase shares in stocks that are classified as Dividend Aristocrats or Dividend Champions.  These are companies that have consistently raised their dividends for a minimum of 25 years.  These investors have clear goals and they are to buy and hang on to stocks that will eventually provide sufficient income for retirement.  I’ve looked over several portfolios constructed this way and the yield is normally in the 3.5% to 3.7% range – perhaps a little higher.  An ETF investor using the “Swensen Six” model comes close to this yield, but does so with much less risk due to the broader diversification.

One of the major drawbacks to DGI investing is that one needs to be a stock picker, although the dividend payout requirements does a lot of screening for followers of this model.  The DGI style of investing has a lot going for it and I am not one to dismiss this approach to portfolio management.

There is another misuse of information that frequently comes out of the dividend investing style and it is popularized by Lowell Miller in his book, The Single Best Investment: Creating Wealth With Dividend Growth.  One of Miller’s fundamental arguments is what I call a “feel good” calculation.  When any of us looks up a ticker on Yahoo! we see what the dividend is per share and the percentage yield.  Miller and his followers don’t use this figure, but instead calculate the yield based on the purchase price.  For someone who purchased Coca-Cola (KO) back in the 1950s, the yield is tremendous.  Calculating the yield of a security based on the purchase price bears little connection to the reality of what the real yield is and that is why I call it a “feel good” calculation.

Reactions to the Seeking Alpha article is welcome.  Enjoy reading and studying the included ideas.

 

(Visited 192 times, 1 visits today)
facebookShare on Facebook
TwitterTweet
FollowFollow us
PinterestSave

Filed Under: Critical Material Tagged With: Critical Material

Meta Data

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Search

Recent Posts

  • Bullish Percent Indicators: 20 May 2022 May 21, 2022
  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 2): 20 May 2022 May 21, 2022
  • Franklin Portfolio Review: 20 May 2022 May 20, 2022
  • Bohr Portfolio Review: 19 May 2022 May 19, 2022
  • How To Handle This Selloff: 18 May 2022 May 18, 2022
  • Kepler Portfolio Review: 17 May 2022 May 17, 2022
  • Galileo Portfolio Review: 17 May 2022 May 17, 2022

Recent Comments

  • Nicholas Demopoulos on How To Handle This Selloff: 18 May 2022
  • Lowell Herr on Kepler Portfolio Review: 17 May 2022
  • Ronald Roccaforte on Kepler Portfolio Review: 17 May 2022
  • Ronald Roccaforte on Kepler Portfolio Review: 17 May 2022
  • Lowell Herr on How To Handle This Selloff: 18 May 2022
  • Richard Dougherty on How To Handle This Selloff: 18 May 2022
  • Lowell Herr on How To Handle This Selloff: 18 May 2022
  • Lowell Herr on Bullish Percent Indicators: 14 May 2022 – Sector Buy Recommendations
  • Lowell Herr on Bullish Percent Indicators: 14 May 2022 – Sector Buy Recommendations
  • jayaraman ramakrishnan on Bullish Percent Indicators: 14 May 2022 – Sector Buy Recommendations

Users Online

4 Users Online
Users: 4 Bots

Popular Posts

  • 2022 Guidelines for Relative Strength Portfolios
  • Hindsight is 2021 – A Year-End Retrospective and…
  • Protected: Modified Kipling Workbook with Risk Ratios
  • Preparing Investments for 2022
  • The True Cost of Management Fees
  • Response to Comments made by ITA member (John Shelton)
  • Investment Policy Statement: February 2022
  • Hawking Portfolio Review – 1 April 2022
  • Using Volatility as a Diversifier and a Portfolio Hedge
  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 1): 8 April 2022

General Investment News

Portfolios coming up for review are:  Huygens and Galileo.  Non-scheduled portfolios may be reviewed.  If you are a new user, check the posts you missed. Links to Random Posts are found in the lower right-hand footer or just to the right of what you are now reading.  Most popular posts are found in the lower left-hand footer.

Check the Forum for more detailed information.  If you wish to begin a financial discussion, use the Forum.

Contact me at itawealth@comcast.net if interested in a Lifetime Membership.  Long-time Platinum members are now Lifetime members and this blog is free to all who signup as a Guest.  A few blogs are reserved for Lifetime members.

Random Posts

  • Hawking Portfolio Review – 1 December 2021
  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 4): 18 February 2022
  • Huygens Portfolio Update: Transition Time
  • Kahneman-Tversky Portfolio Review: 29 October 2021
  • Millikan Portfolio Review: 27 January 2022
  • Gauss Portfolio: March 2021 Update
  • The Feynman Study: Part 6-4
  • Portfolio Performance Data: 8 January 2022
  • The Feynman Study: Part 6-5
  • Huygens Update: 20 October 2021
  • Carson Trio Review: 31 August 2020 – Continuing The Experiment

Log in | Website Design by BOING