ITA Wealth Management

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Guest Registration
  • Lifetime Member
  • Forum
  • Reset Password
  • Contact Me
  • About Me
You are here: Home / Critical Material / Risk Parity: A Brief Explanation of How Risky a 60/40 Portfolio Really Is

Risk Parity: A Brief Explanation of How Risky a 60/40 Portfolio Really Is

June 13, 2014 By Lowell Herr

Risk Parity: A Brief Explanation of How Risky a 60/40 Portfolio Really Is 1

Mortar and Pestle found on a farm in the Willamette Valley – Oregon

This is a follow-up to the HedgeHunter Risk Parity (RP) post.  This blog post will give readers an overview of how RP is calculated.  This not for the mathematically squeamish, but the concept is not difficult if one can get past one step in the logic.  I agree with HedgeHunter as to flaws in this logic.*  I think RP falls under the Schwert Rule, but that can wait for another discussion.  Let me explain the RP calculation by first beginning with a reference to a paper (Risk Parity Allocation by Edward Qian) that brought this idea to my attention.

A standard portfolio breakdown between stocks and bonds is 60%/40%.  Most investors will argue this is a well-diversified and somewhat conservative portfolio.  It is certainly more conservative than most of the ITA Wealth Management portfolios.  But is the 60/40 mix a conservative portfolio?  I just checked my data sources and found that the standard deviation (SD) of stocks over the past five years is +/-16% and the SD for bonds is +/-3%.  However, when one takes variance into account, we must square each number so the 16% has a variance of 256 and for bonds it is 3 x 3 or 9.  In terms of variance, stocks are 28 (256/9 = 28.4 or 28 when rounded) times riskier than bonds.  That is a huge difference.  Even if stocks carried a standard deviation of 15% and bonds 5%, in terms of variance, stocks are nine times riskier than bonds. 

To borrow an analogy from Edward Qian, if we go back to the 60/40 stock to bond split, we have six stock eggs and four bond eggs.  To calculate the true risk to stocks we find we have 172 (28 x 6 + 4) eggs in total.  One hundred sixty eight (168) out of 172 is approximately 98%.  Very close to 100% of the 60/40 portfolio of risk is carried by the stock portion of the portfolio.

I need to begin rethinking how a portfolio is put together and Platinum readers would do well to pay attention.  The 70/30 or even 80/20 mix is fine when stocks are in the ascendency.  But let another bear market strike, and the high stock to bond portfolios are in for another two to three sigma shakedown.  That is exactly what we want to avoid.  How to pull together the ideas of Risk-Parity and the ITA Risk Reduction model is a worthy project.

* Risk Parity has had a wonderful run due to the long decline in interest rates over the past 30 years.  Results look particularly attractive when TLT is one of the “bond” options.

(Visited 472 times, 1 visits today)
facebookShare on Facebook
TwitterTweet
FollowFollow us
PinterestSave

Filed Under: Critical Material, Risk Parity Tagged With: Risk Parity

Comments

  1. Rick Rogers says

    June 13, 2014 at 4:37 AM

    I read this a few days ago. I think Lowell may have referenced the article.

    “Asset allocation requires swimming against the tide.
    Investors, regardless of whether they are institutional or individual, tend to follow trends
    when determining asset allocation decisions. Yet, history has shown that swimming against the tide and investing in unpopular asset classes has been the route to true diversification and investment success. ”

    from: Richard Bernstein – Worried about the downside?

    http://www.rbadvisors.com/templates/dmd/images/pdfs/worried_about_the_downside.pdf

    • Lowell Herr says

      June 13, 2014 at 5:04 AM

      Rick,

      I’m not sure if I referenced the article, but it is worth reading. One of my favorite Richard Bernstein quotes (not to be confused with William Bernstein) is the following.

      “Diversification isn’t based on the number of asset classes, it’s based on the correlation of returns among the asset classes.”

      This is what the Cluster spreadsheets are all about – finding low correlated ETFs.

      Lowell

Meta Data

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Search

Recent Posts

  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 2): 24 June 2022 June 26, 2022
  • Bullish Percent Indicators: 24 June 2022 June 25, 2022
  • Darwin Portfolio Review: 17 June 2022 June 19, 2022
  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 1): 17 June 2022 June 18, 2022
  • Bullish Percent Indicators: 17 June 2022 June 18, 2022
  • Portfolio Management In A Volatile and Bearish Market June 13, 2022
  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 5): 10 June 2022 June 11, 2022

Recent Comments

  • Lowell Herr on Bullish Percent Indicators: 17 June 2022
  • Lowell Herr on Bullish Percent Indicators: 10 June 2022
  • Lowell Herr on Bullish Percent Indicators: 10 June 2022
  • Mark Holbrook on Bullish Percent Indicators: 10 June 2022
  • Lowell Herr on Bullish Percent Indicators: 10 June 2022
  • Mark Holbrook on Bullish Percent Indicators: 10 June 2022
  • Lowell Herr on Bullish Percent Indicators: 20 May 2022
  • Lowell Herr on McClintock Portfolio Review: 10 June 2022
  • Lowell Herr on Bullish Percent Indicators: 20 May 2022
  • Steven Lefley on Bullish Percent Indicators: 20 May 2022

Users Online

8 Users Online
Users: 2 Guests, 6 Bots

Popular Posts

  • Hawking Portfolio Review – 1 April 2022
  • Investment Policy Statement: February 2022
  • How To Handle This Selloff: 18 May 2022
  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 1): 8 April 2022
  • 2022 Guidelines for Relative Strength Portfolios
  • Kepler Portfolio Review: 15 March 2022
  • Hawking Portfolio Review – 1 March 2022
  • Schrodinger Portfolio Review: 4 February 2022
  • Using Volatility as a Diversifier and a Portfolio Hedge
  • Schrodinger Portfolio Review: 10 March 2022

General Investment News

Portfolios coming up for review are:  Huygens, Galileo, Carson Trio, and Einstein.  Non-scheduled portfolios may be reviewed.  If you are a new user, check the posts you missed. Links to Random Posts are found in the lower right-hand footer or just to the right of what you are now reading.  Most popular posts are found in the lower left-hand footer.

Check the Forum for more detailed information.  If you wish to begin a financial discussion, use the Forum.

Contact me at itawealth@comcast.net if interested in a Lifetime Membership.  Long-time Platinum members are now Lifetime members and this blog is free to all who signup as a Guest.  A few blogs are reserved for Lifetime members.

Random Posts

  • Pauling Portfolio Review: 19 November 2021
  • Test Notification of New Blog Posts
  • Franklin Portfolio Update: 23 March 2022
  • The Feynman Study: Part 1
  • Beating the Dow With Bonds
  • Kepler Portfolio Review: 15 March 2022
  • Portfolio Management In A Volatile and Bearish Market
  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 3): 22 April 2022
  • Galileo Portfolio Review: 22 March 2022
  • Hawking Portfolio Review – 31 December 2021
  • Darwin Portfolio Review: 17 June 2022

Log in | Website Design by BOING