ITA Wealth Management

  • Home
  • Blog
    • How To Use ITA Blog
    • Golden Rule of Investing
    • Basic Investing Principles
  • Guest Registration
  • Forum
  • Reset Password
  • About Me
    • Archive
    • Contact
You are here: Home / Archives for Portfolio Performance

Hawking Portfolio Review: 10 January, 2023

January 11, 2023 By hedgehunter

The Hawking Portfolio is a Buy-and-Hold “Income” Portfolio built from Closed-End-Funds (CEFs) paying high yields (>8%) and, generally, selling at a discount (at least at the time of purchase). The composition of the current portfolio looks like this: with performance over the past 2 years

Filed Under: Hawking Portfolio, Portfolio Management, Portfolio Performance Tagged With: Hawking Portfolio, Portfolio Management, Portfolio Performance

Kahneman-Tversky Portfolio Review: 9 January, 2023

January 10, 2023 By hedgehunter

We start off the New Year with the following picture of performance for the Kahneman-Tversky (K-T) Portfolio through 2022: The portfolio showed less volatility than the benchmark AOR Fund but returns were slightly lower with a ~16% draw-down on the year. This compares with a

Filed Under: Kahneman-Tversky Portfolio, Portfolio Management, Portfolio Performance Tagged With: Kahneman-Tversky Portfolio, Portfolio Management, Portfolio Performance

Darwin Portfolio Review: 6 January 2023

January 9, 2023 By hedgehunter

The Darwin Portfolio is a relatively inert portfolio in that all assets in the portfolio quiver are held continuously (Buy-and-Hold) in allocations designed to keep the risk from each asset at defined levels as calculated from volatility measurements over time. Throughout most of 2022 I

Filed Under: Darwin Portfolio, Portfolio Management, Portfolio Performance Tagged With: Darwin Portfolio, Portfolio Management, Portfolio Performance

Kahneman-Tversky Portfolio Review: 30 December, 2022

January 1, 2023 By hedgehunter

The Kahneman-Tversky Portfolio, that uses the simplest Dual Momentum (DM) model to select one asset from a basket of three, did not perform particularly well in 2022: closing down ~18.4% on the year. While this is slightly less than the ~20% drop in value

Filed Under: Kahneman-Tversky Portfolio, Portfolio Management, Portfolio Performance Tagged With: Kahneman-Tversky Portfolio, Portfolio Management, Portfolio Performance

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19

Meta Data

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Search

Recent Posts

  • Gauss Portfolio Review: 5 March 2026 March 5, 2026
  • Pauling Portfolio Review: 3 March 2026 March 3, 2026
  • Carson Portfolio Review: 26 February 2026 February 26, 2026
  • Schrodinger Portfolio Update: 24 February 2026 February 24, 2026
  • Franklin Sector BPI Portfolio Update: 20 February 2026 February 20, 2026
  • Bohr Portfolio Review: 18 February 2026 February 18, 2026
  • Copernicus Portfolio Update: 12 February 2026 February 12, 2026

Recent Comments

  • Lowell Herr on Copernicus Portfolio Update: 12 February 2026
  • Lowell Herr on Bullish Percent Indicators: 21 November 2025
  • Lowell Herr on Beta: A Brief Description
  • Lowell Herr on McClintock Sector BPI Portfolio Update: 16 January 2026
  • Lowell Herr on Copernicus Portfolio Update: 15 January 2026
  • Lowell Herr on Millikan Portfolio Review: 13 January 2026
  • BOB_P on Millikan Portfolio Review: 13 January 2026
  • Lowell Herr on Millikan Portfolio Review: 13 January 2026
  • Lowell Herr on Millikan Portfolio Review: 13 January 2026
  • Lowell Herr on Millikan Portfolio Review: 13 January 2026

Popular Posts

  • Schrodinger Portfolio Review: 29 January 2026
  • Gifting a Grandchild
  • Darwin 2026: 2 January 2026
  • McClintock Sector BPI Portfolio Update: 16 January 2026
  • Millikan Portfolio Review: 13 January 2026
  • Beating the Dow With Bonds
  • Copernicus Portfolio Update: 14 December 2025
  • Carson Sector BPI Portfolio Update: 30 December 2025
  • Beta: A Brief Description
  • Schrodinger Portfolio Update: 24 February 2026

General Investment News

Portfolios coming up for review.  Bethe, Copernicus and McClintock are the critical portfolios next up for review.  Non-scheduled portfolios may be reviewed.  If you are a new user, check the posts you missed. Links to Random Posts are found in the lower right-hand footer or just to the right of what you are now reading.  Most popular posts are found in the lower left-hand footer.

Check the Forum for more detailed information.  If you wish to begin a financial discussion, use the Forum.

This blog is free to all who signup as a Guest.

Random Posts

  • The Elements of Investing: Part I
  • Copernicus Portfolio Update: 12 February 2026
  • Bullish Percent Indicators: 21 April 2023
  • Retirement Planning Mistake #5
  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 1): 17 November 2023
  • The Nasty Mathematics of Volatility
  • How Risky is Your Portfolio? – Another Perspective
  • Rutherford Portfolio Review (Tranche 2): 27 October 2023
  • Bethe Portfolio Review: 30 May 2023
  • Bullish Percent Indicators: 27 January 2023
  • Rutherford-Darwin Portfolio Review – 10 January 2025

Log in | Website Design by BOING

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.