ITA Wealth Management

  • Home
  • Blog
    • How To Use ITA Blog
    • Golden Rule of Investing
    • Basic Investing Principles
  • Guest Registration
  • Forum
  • Reset Password
  • About Me
    • Archive
    • Contact
You are here: Home / Forum

Forum

  • Forums
  • Members
  • Recent Posts
Forums
ITA Forums
Recession Preparati...
More on Vanguard
 
Notifications
Clear all

More on Vanguard

 
Recession Preparation
Last Post by Lowell Herr 2 months ago
2 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
332 Views
RSS
Forum 1
 Lowell Herr
(@lowell)
Noble Member Admin Registered
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 782
Topic starter August 30, 2026 5:53 AM  

I just checked Vanguard's website and I see where a number of their recommended portfolios are still 60% equities and 40% bonds.  Apparently the site is not quick to make the changes I see reported on YouTube.

Lowell



   
Quote
Topic Tags
Vanguard
Forum 1
 Lowell Herr
(@lowell)
Noble Member Admin Registered
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 782
Topic starter August 30, 2026 9:00 AM  

Here is information from ChatGPT.

"Yes — there was a Vanguard-related recommendation for a 30% stocks / 70% bonds portfolio, but there is an important distinction.

In 2025, Vanguard's long-term capital-market forecasts led to commentary that a 70% bonds / 30% stocks allocation could be attractive for investors with a relatively short withdrawal horizon. Some media reports characterized this as "Vanguard recommending 70% bonds."

However, I would not describe 30/70 as Vanguard's current blanket recommendation for all investors.

What Vanguard is saying now

Vanguard's 2026 tactical/time-varying portfolio is currently approximately:

40% stocks / 60% bonds

Vanguard explicitly describes this as more conservative than the traditional 60/40 portfolio because it believes investors aren't currently being adequately compensated for the risk of U.S. equities.

Vanguard's 2026 outlook also says it favors high-quality bonds, with bonds offering attractive real returns and diversification if economic growth disappoints.

Where the 30/70 figure came from

The 30/70 allocation is not simply a mistaken number. Vanguard's research around 2025 was showing that, under certain assumptions and particularly for investors with shorter withdrawal horizons, substantially higher bond allocations could make sense. That's why you may have seen headlines saying Vanguard was recommending 70% bonds.

There is also a Vanguard Conservative LifeStrategy allocation of 20% stocks / 80% bonds, demonstrating that Vanguard does use allocations more conservative than 40/60 when the investor's risk tolerance and objectives warrant it.

For your situation

Given your repeated interest in protecting capital, preparing for a major market correction, and generating retirement income, I think the more useful question is not simply "30/70 or 40/60?"

I'd compare:

Allocation Stocks Bonds Risk level
Conservative 30% 70% Lower
Vanguard current tactical 40% 60% Moderate
Traditional balanced 60% 40% Moderate-high
Growth 70% 30% High

For a retiree concerned about a major correction, I would take the 30/70 proposal seriously. It is considerably more consistent with capital preservation than 60/40, while retaining enough equity exposure to provide long-term growth."

I will continue to look for the latest information from Vanguard and other major brokers.

Lowell



   
ReplyQuote

Leave a reply

Author Name

Author Email

Title *

 
Preview 0 Revisions Save Draft Saved
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Related Topics
  • Vanguard Recommending Investors Reduce Equity Exposure
    2 months ago
Topic Tags:  Vanguard (5) ,

Search Blog

Recent Posts

  • Kepler Portfolio Update: 20 October 2026
  • Huygens Asset Allocation Portfolio: 19 October 2026
  • Darwin 2026 Portfolio Review: 16 October 2026
  • ChatGPT Evaluates The Copernicus Portfolio
  • Millikan Portfolio Update: 15 October 2026
Share:
Forum Information
Recent Posts
Unread Posts
Tags
  • 18 Forums
  • 688 Topics
  • 860 Posts
  • 57 Online
  • 305 Members
Our newest member: dpa790683
Latest Post: Strong Equities Market
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

 Powered by wpForo version 3.2.2

(Visited 76,978 times, 5,710 visits today)

Meta Data

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Search

Recent Posts

  • Kepler Portfolio Update: 20 October 2026 October 20, 2026
  • Huygens Asset Allocation Portfolio: 19 October 2026 October 19, 2026
  • Darwin 2026 Portfolio Review: 16 October 2026 October 18, 2026
  • ChatGPT Evaluates The Copernicus Portfolio October 16, 2026
  • Millikan Portfolio Update: 15 October 2026 October 15, 2026
  • Copernicus Portfolio Update: 13 October 2026 October 14, 2026
  • Dirac 2026 Portfolio Review: 12 October 2026 October 14, 2026

Recent Comments

  • Lowell Herr on Kepler Portfolio Update: 20 October 2026
  • Lowell Herr on ChatGPT Evaluates The Copernicus Portfolio
  • Robert Warasila on ChatGPT Evaluates The Copernicus Portfolio
  • Lowell Herr on ChatGPT Evaluates The Copernicus Portfolio
  • Robert Warasila on ChatGPT Evaluates The Copernicus Portfolio
  • Lowell Herr on Pauling Portfolio Update: 6 October 2026
  • BOB_P on Pauling Portfolio Update: 6 October 2026
  • Lowell Herr on Pauling Portfolio Update: 6 October 2026
  • Lowell Herr on Pauling Portfolio Update: 6 October 2026
  • BOB_P on Pauling Portfolio Update: 6 October 2026

Popular Posts

  • Dual Momentum Investing by Gary Antonacci
  • Pauling Portfolio Review: 7 August 2026
  • Darwin Portfolio Review: 2 October, 2026
  • Buffett Indicator & Shiller PE Ratio
  • Pauling Portfolio Update: 6 October 2026
  • Millikan Portfolio Review: 20 August 2026
  • Carson Sector BPI Portfolio Update: 12 August 2026
  • Schrodinger Portfolio Update: 2 October 2026
  • Financial Repression: Part 1
  • Bohr Portfolio Update: 1 October 2026

General Investment News

Portfolios coming up for review.  Gauss, Copernicus, and Millikan are the critical portfolios next up for review.  Non-scheduled portfolios may be reviewed.  If you are a new user, check the posts you missed. Links to Random Posts are found in the lower right-hand footer or just to the right of what you are now reading.  Most popular posts are found in the lower left-hand footer.

Check the Forum for more detailed information.  If you wish to begin a financial discussion, use the Forum.

This blog is free to all who signup as a Guest.

Random Posts

  • Relative Portfolio Performance Data: 4 October 2024
  • McClintock Sector BPI Portfolio Review: 10 February 2026
  • Bohr Asset Allocation Portfolio Review: 4 April 2025
  • Einstein Sector BPI Portfolio Review: 7 May 2024
  • Kepler Portfolio Review: 8 October 2026
  • Gauss Asset Allocation Portfolio Review: 5 February 2025
  • McClintock Dual Momentum Portfolio Review: 9 June 2023
  • Schrodinger Intelligent Portfolio Update: 28 June 2024
  • William Bernstein’s Latest E-Book: Getting Rich Slowly
  • Huygens Portfolio Review: 27 October 2025
  • Darwin Portfolio Review: 2 June 2023

Log in | Website Design by BOING

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.